by PolesApart » Mon Mar 23, 2015 3:31 pm
Luckily, I could live with that, i.e. it's the "ok" scenario. As long as information isn't lost, it's ok for it to be repeated, even if it gets ugly sometimes (most times?), but ideally the viewport scrolling would be as precise as possible, i.e. the scroll amount should't be too much (as to scroll over undisplayed information) or too little (as to repeat information unnecessarily), or, putting in other words, in sites that *don't* have top banners as the one you suggest, the alignment should be pixel-exact or very close. Or to put in yet another words, it shouldn't mess with the content even more than it already is.
The ideal scenario would be to have a virtual viewport that is more or less in width than a screen, but that the height is so large that the content would be rendered with this kind of "header" just on top of it (or seldomly, as the viewport must have some finity) and everything else would be a huge continuation, i.e. an improved (from my application point of view) version of what I'd get with printing, but keeping WISIWYG rule, except that images would be breaked by the screen height or some other arbitrary mark, and another image would start on the next pixel line.
But I'm settling for way less: If I can automate what the user would manually get by printscreen and scrolling (as long as the scroll is not too dumb), that suffices.